Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and White | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M40, getting an 87.6 score against 85. LG V60 ThinQ is a newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy M40, but it is somewhat thicker and way heavier. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M40 has Android 10 version.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy M40, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. Galaxy M40 and LG V60 ThinQ count with quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy M40 has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little greater display density.
LG V60 ThinQ has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy M40, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ features a way better battery performance than Galaxy M40, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Galaxy M40 features just a bit better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a much lower 3840x2160 video quality, a way tinier back-facing camera sensor giving a much worse image quality and a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.