Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is a bit better than LG V60 ThinQ's 87.6 overall score. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M51 has an older 10 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11 version. The Galaxy M51 construction is a bit lighter but a bit thicker than LG V60 ThinQ, and both of them were released with only 6 months difference.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a bit higher pixels amount in each display inch and a quite larger display. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M51, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy M51 has a really longer battery life than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
The Galaxy M51 captures much clearer pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller sensor taking worse quality photos and videos, they both have the same (4K) video resolution, a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.