Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, having a global score of 90.8 against 87.6. Although Galaxy Note 20 and the LG V60 ThinQ were released only a couple months apart, Galaxy Note 20 is lighter and a little bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a screen that is just as good as the LG V60 ThinQ one, although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit worse screen pixels density, a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit more powerful processor than LG V60 ThinQ. Both have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy Note 20 takes a bit better videos and photos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a tinier sensor, a lower 7680x4320 video quality and a way less megapixels resolution camera, they both have a same size aperture.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V60 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note 20, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG V60 ThinQ, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.