Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Galaxy Note 5, with a overall score of 87.6 against 79.3. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is much newer than Galaxy Note 5, it's extremely heavier and thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version and Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1, offering a lot of extra features.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a quite better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a much better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. LG V60 ThinQ shoots slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a way bigger camera sensor, a lot more MP back-facing camera, a lot higher video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.