Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, with an 87.6 score against 80.4. LG V60 ThinQ's design is way newer than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, but it is a lot heavier and somewhat thicker. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has just a bit better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel quantity per inch of display.
LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ captures slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a way bigger camera sensor taking much better quality pictures.
LG V60 ThinQ features a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3200mAh.
The LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.