Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is a bit better than LG V60 ThinQ's 87.6 score. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a lighter and somewhat thinner device than the LG V60 ThinQ, even when they were only released 7 months apart. Samsung Galaxy Note10 and LG V60 ThinQ both have incredibly similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit better pixels density.
The LG V60 ThinQ and the Galaxy Note10 both have incredibly similar processors, both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. LG V60 ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43 percent greater battery size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V60 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.