Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, having a global score of 87.6 against 77.7. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. The LG V60 ThinQ is a noticeably newer device than Samsung Galaxy Note3, but it's incredibly heavier and just a bit thicker.
The LG V60 ThinQ has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more processing cores and 5 GB more RAM. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution, a bigger display and a quite better pixel density.
LG V60 ThinQ takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has a lot larger sensor, a back camera with much more mega-pixels, a way better video definition and a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images. The LG V60 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.