Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Blue and White | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note8, having an 87.6 score against 83. Although LG V60 ThinQ is way newer than the Galaxy Note8, it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version while Galaxy Note8 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy Note8 counts with a little more vivid display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a higher pixel density. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Note8, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V60 ThinQ captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot better video definition, a much better resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note8, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG V60 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.