Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is a bit better than LG V60 ThinQ's score of 87.6. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should give the same operating system features. Samsung Galaxy S10 is an older phone than LG V60 ThinQ, but it's much lighter and thinner anyway.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a little bit better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for apps and games than Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S10 and LG V60 ThinQ feature really similar processing units, both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. LG V60 ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera, a way better video quality and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.