Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is slightly better than the LG V60 ThinQ, having a score of 93.6 against 87.6. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S10 5G is older than the LG V60 ThinQ, it's construction is somewhat thinner and a little lighter. These phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Galaxy S10 5G features a processing unit that is very similar to the LG V60 ThinQ one, both have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a slightly better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs and video in low light environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution, a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
LG V60 ThinQ features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a bit more expensive than LG V60 ThinQ, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.