Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, having an 89.7 score against 87.6. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's body is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than LG V60 ThinQ, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart. The Galaxy S10 Lite and LG V60 ThinQ have incredibly similar processors, they have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a display that's just as good as the screen in LG V60 ThinQ, although the Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse count of pixels per display inch. The LG V60 ThinQ has a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size. Galaxy S10 Lite has a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower 48 mega pixels resolution, a much lower (4K) video definition, a tinier sensor providing a worse image quality and a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting images and/or video in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy S10 Lite is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.