Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blue and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy S10e, having an 87.6 score against 86.3. The LG V60 ThinQ is a newer phone than Galaxy S10e, although it is thicker and a lot heavier. LG V60 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy S10e have very similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10e has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S10e has just a bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels amount per display inch. LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10e, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.