Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is slightly better than LG V60 ThinQ's global score of 87.6. These phones include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. The Galaxy S20 FE is a just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter phone than LG V60 ThinQ, even though both were released with only 7 months difference.
LG V60 ThinQ and Galaxy S20 FE both count with similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy S20 FE has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy S20 FE counts with a little sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better display density.
LG V60 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S20 FE features a slightly better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a lot lower resolution back facing camera, a lot worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a tinier back-facing camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and images, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V60 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the LG V60 ThinQ, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.