Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the LG V60 ThinQ, getting a 98 score against 87.6. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a just a bit heavier phone than the LG V60 ThinQ, but they are 0.35inches thick. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has 13 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a little bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit better CPU than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ has more memory for games and applications than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures way better photographs and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier sensor, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, a F1.8 aperture and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 108 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a battery life that is just as good as the LG V60 ThinQ one.
Although Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V60 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V60 ThinQ, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.