Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue and White | Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 722.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 has a general score of 91.8, which is a little bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ's general score of 87.6. Galaxy S21 is a newer cellphone, and it is also way lighter and thinner than LG V60 ThinQ. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding OS features.
The Samsung Galaxy S21's processing unit is just as good as LG V60 ThinQ's processor, both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy S21 features a sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels in each screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S21 has a little bit better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a tinier sensor, a lower 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with a way worse 12 MP resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S21, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S21, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S21 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V60 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy S21, otherwise you can save some money and get the LG V60 ThinQ, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.