Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a global score of 89.1, which is a little bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ's score of 87.6. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE design is newer, somewhat thinner and way lighter than LG V60 ThinQ. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should give very similar OS features.
LG V60 ThinQ and Galaxy S21 FE feature quite similar processing units, and although the Galaxy S21 FE has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with just a bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels quantity in each screen inch.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a way more mega pixels back camera and a way higher video quality.
The LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V60 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get LG V60 ThinQ, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.