Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 has a score of 93.4, which is just a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ's 87.6 global score. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 has a newer 13 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features. The Samsung Galaxy S22 is a newer phone, and it is also much lighter and thinner than LG V60 ThinQ.
Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a much sharper screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater pixels density. The LG V60 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S22. They have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S22 features a very superior camera than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a camera with a way worse resolution and a lower 7680x4320 video quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a larger camera sensor.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V60 ThinQ. If you want to save some dollars, you can get LG V60 ThinQ, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.