Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a little bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, with a 95.4 score against 87.6. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a a little heavier device than LG V60 ThinQ, but they are equally thin. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11 version.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the same 7680x4320 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a camera with much more mega pixels.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and LG V60 ThinQ both have similar battery durations.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V60 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.