Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-20 | -- |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.72 ounces | -- |
| Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy S25, getting a overall score of 87.6 against 82.6. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V60 ThinQ has older 11 version while Galaxy S25 has Android 14 version. Galaxy S25 counts with a much better looking display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better screen density.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a much better processing power than Galaxy S25. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with better battery life than Galaxy S25, because it has a 25% more battery size. Galaxy S25 captures a lot better photographs and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse 50 mega-pixels resolution and a worse video resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a larger sensor.
LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.