Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-03-20 | -- |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 7.72 ounces | -- |
| Blue and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is a bit better than LG V60 ThinQ's 87.6 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has newer 14 version while LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11 version. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is much lighter and way thinner than the LG V60 ThinQ.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better display than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a greater pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way better processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a way larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a much more MP back camera and a bigger camera aperture.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra count with incredibly similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.