Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than Galaxy S7, getting an 87.6 score against 79.5. Although LG V60 ThinQ is noticeably newer than Galaxy S7, it's somewhat thicker and notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy S7, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. LG V60 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality photographs, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S7. If you want to save some money, you can get Galaxy S7, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.