Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and White | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a general score of 87.6, which is better than the Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. LG V60 ThinQ is a noticeably newer and thinner cellphone than the Galaxy S7 Active, but it is also heavier. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and more processing cores.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The LG V60 ThinQ shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking photos and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ costs more than the Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.