Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-03-20 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the Galaxy S7 edge, with an 87.6 score against 78.1. These phones come with Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has older 11 version and Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though LG V60 ThinQ is noticeably newer than the Galaxy S7 edge, it is much heavier and somewhat thicker.
LG V60 ThinQ features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Galaxy S7 edge counts with a little more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better number of pixels per inch in the screen.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. The LG V60 ThinQ features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 39% larger battery capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality and a way more mega pixels camera.
The LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Galaxy S7 edge, making it easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.