Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Blue and White | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S8, having an 87.6 score against 81.7. The LG V60 ThinQ design is way newer than the Samsung Galaxy S8's, but it's somewhat thicker and way heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a little sharper screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S8, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photos or videos in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution, a way bigger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a lot higher video resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy S8, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S8, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S8. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S8, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.