Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue and White | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, getting an 87.6 score against 81.9. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is way newer and somewhat thinner, but also a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a bit sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. LG V60 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much more MP back-facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ costs more money than Galaxy S8 Active, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.