Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Galaxy S9, having an 87.6 score against 83.3. Even though the LG V60 ThinQ is noticeably newer than the Galaxy S9, it is way heavier and just a little bit thicker. The Galaxy S9 features a little more vivid screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The LG V60 ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has more RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, a way better video resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has more internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ features a superior battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 67 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S9. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy S9, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.