Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 score. LG V60 ThinQ is a just a little lighter and thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although they were released only 2 months apart. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM. LG V60 ThinQ and Galaxy XCover Pro count with quite similar screens, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little higher display pixels density.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a back facing camera with lot more MP and a lot larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has greater battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.