Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is slightly better than LG V60 ThinQ, with a 92.3 score against 87.6. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and LG V60 ThinQ were released only a few months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so both should give identical operating system features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little sharper screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a little better performance than LG V60 ThinQ. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
LG V60 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a lot higher video definition, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V60 ThinQ. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.