Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, getting a general score of 94.6 against 87.6. These phones use the same Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is noticeably thinner but incredibly heavier than LG V60 ThinQ, and both of them were released with only a few months difference.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better performance than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a screen that's very similar to the LG V60 ThinQ one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208px and a little bigger display.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V60 ThinQ has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, a smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a lower image quality and a much worse (4K) video resolution, they both have a same size camera aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V60 ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG V60 ThinQ, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.