Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Blue and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | -- |
| 10.34 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is just a bit better than the LG V60 ThinQ, having a general score of 90.6 against 87.6. Both devices in this review have the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should provide very similar OS features. Galaxy Z Fold 3's body is newer and much thinner, but also somewhat heavier than LG V60 ThinQ.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG V60 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 4 GB more RAM. The LG V60 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2460px, it also counts with a bit better pixel density.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a way more MP camera in the back and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and video. LG V60 ThinQ has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.