Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-03-20 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's overall score of 79. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has older 11 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is newer and a lot thinner than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact's, although it is incredibly heavier.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a much better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a much smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels quantity in each inch in the display.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact takes a little bit better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a much smaller back camera sensor capturing way worse quality images and videos, a back camera with a much worse resolution, a smaller aperture and a lot lower 3840x2160 video definition. LG V60 ThinQ has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a much better battery life than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.