Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is much better than Sony Xperia Z4v's global score of 78.8. The LG V60 ThinQ is a notably newer phone than Sony Xperia Z4v, but it is just a bit thicker and heavier. These devices use Android OS, but LG V60 ThinQ has newer 11 version while Sony Xperia Z4v has Android 5.1, giving some additional features.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V60 ThinQ also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory. The Sony Xperia Z4v has a brighter screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen.
The Xperia Z4v shoots a bit better photos and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a much lower 3840x2160 video quality, a camera in the back with a much lower 20.7 megapixels resolution, a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos and a way smaller back-facing camera sensor taking much worse quality photographs.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage. LG V60 ThinQ has a superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia Z4v, because it has a 67 percent greater battery size.
The LG V60 ThinQ costs more money than Sony Xperia Z4v, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.