Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is slightly better than LG V60 ThinQ, having a global score of 87.9 against 87.6. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro body has the same thickness than the LG V60 ThinQ, but it is just a little bit heavier. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has 10 version and LG V60 ThinQ has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a processor that is very similar to the processor in LG V60 ThinQ, and although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a little bit smaller display, a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a just a little worse count of pixels per inch of screen.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing photographs or videos in low-light situations, they both have the same video frame rates, a back facing camera with a 64 megapixels resolution, the same video quality and a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor.
The LG V60 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ has a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.