Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue and White | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, getting a overall score of 87.6 against 81.6. The LG V60 ThinQ design is just a bit heavier but a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and both of them were released with only a few months difference. These devices work with Android operating system, but LG V60 ThinQ has 11 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10, so it offers lots of additional features.
LG V60 ThinQ has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little bit better screen than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a quite smaller screen, a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit lower screen pixels density.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes much better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and videos in poorly lited situations, they both have the same sensor size, the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a 64 MP camera in the back.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features just a little better battery performance than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.