Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-03-20 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.72 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue and White | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 333.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, having an 87.6 score against 81.1. The LG V60 ThinQ is a just a little heavier phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but they are 0.35inches thick. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V60 ThinQ has a more recent 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, giving some additional features.
LG V60 ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V60 ThinQ has a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has a bit higher pixel number per inch in the screen, a slightly higher 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little larger display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, they both have the same video frame rate, a 64 mega-pixels back facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 0.59 inches back camera sensor.
LG V60 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's battery life is very similar to the battery life in LG V60 ThinQ, although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a 0% greater battery capacity.
LG V60 ThinQ costs a little more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.