Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| 2020-05-15 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the HTC U11's score of 77.6. LG Velvet is a a little bit heavier device than the HTC U11, but both are 0.31inches thick. HTC U11 has a slightly better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better display pixel density.
HTC U11's processing unit is very similar to LG Velvet's processing unit, and although the HTC U11 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. LG Velvet captures much better videos and photos than HTC U11, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking images or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot more MP camera and a lot larger back camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
The LG Velvet counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U11, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage. LG Velvet features a way better battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 43% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, LG Velvet is also cheaper than the HTC U11.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.