Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Neo's 83.1 general score. The LG Velvet construction has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, but it's heavier. LG Velvet and Motorola Edge 30 Neo both feature quite similar displays, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a bit better display density.
LG Velvet features a bit faster processor than Motorola Edge 30 Neo. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM memory amount. The LG Velvet features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Velvet captures a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a way lower 48 MP resolution back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution. LG Velvet has a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity against 4020mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.