Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is better than Motorola Edge 40 Neo's global score of 77. The LG Velvet is a just a little heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but both have the same thickness. LG Velvet has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo captures a bit better pictures and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a much larger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and videos and a more mega pixels camera in the back.
The LG Velvet has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG Velvet also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.