Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, getting an 87.1 score against 81.9. LG Velvet's design is just a little thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it's just a little heavier and was released many years before. The LG Velvet has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much more vibrant screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1256 x 2760 resolution and a bit better display density. LG Velvet counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a battery life that's very similar to the LG Velvet one, although the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a 0% larger battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots a little bit better videos and photos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the same video frame rate and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a better resolution camera and a much larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.