Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 general score. The LG Velvet design is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it was released many years before. The LG Velvet features a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a sharper display than LG Velvet, although it has a little smaller screen, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little lower quantity of pixels per inch of screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has slightly more memory capacity for applications and games than LG Velvet, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot bigger camera sensor taking much better quality pictures, higher 60 fps video frame rates, a back facing camera with more mega pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a little bit longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.