Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPS |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is slightly better than the Motorola One 5G Ace, getting an 87.1 score against 81.6. Even when the LG Velvet and the Motorola One 5G Ace were only released with a couple of months difference, the LG Velvet is noticeably thinner and lighter. The LG Velvet has a little more vivid display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has a quite higher amount of pixels in each inch of display, a quite bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet features a little faster processor than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola One 5G Ace has greater battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. LG Velvet counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola One 5G Ace, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and videos, they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, a 48 mega pixels back facing camera and the same (4K) video resolution.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG Velvet is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.