Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is better than OPPO Find X2 Neo, getting an 87.1 score against 77.7. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, the LG Velvet design is a bit thicker and just a bit heavier than OPPO Find X2 Neo. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit better processor than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit more vivid display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit better quantity of pixels per inch in the display. OPPO Find X2 Neo shoots slightly better photos and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a camera in the back with a 48 mega pixels resolution and the same back-facing camera sensor size, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos.
The LG Velvet features a superior storage for applications and games than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet has just a bit longer battery duration than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.