Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is better than OPPO Find X3 Neo's 76 general score. The LG Velvet body has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it's just a little lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a just a little better count of pixels in each screen inch.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit better CPU than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The OPPO Find X3 Neo's camera is just as good as LG Velvet's camera, and although the OPPO Find X3 Neo has higher 60 fps video frame rate and a higher resolution camera, they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture.
The LG Velvet has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit better battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The LG Velvet not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.