Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, having an 87.1 score against 77.4. Despite of the fact that the LG Velvet is much older than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, it's construction is just a little lighter and a little bit thinner. The LG Velvet has a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Velvet also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A15 5G has a bit better display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite better screen density. LG Velvet takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 48 mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a much higher video definition.
LG Velvet has a greater storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A15 5G counts with improved battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
LG Velvet costs more money than Galaxy A15 5G, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.