Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2020-05-15 | -- |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | -- |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored)'s 78.7 global score. The LG Velvet has a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The LG Velvet features a slightly better looking display than Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), because although it has a quite worse screen density, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2460px resolution.
The LG Velvet has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) features greater battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 16 percent greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) has a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Rumored) also has a back facing camera with a higher resolution and a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.