Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy F23's 84.6 overall score. Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a display that is just as good as LG Velvet's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy F23 has a bit smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2408 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
The LG Velvet has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy F23, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Velvet also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG Velvet features a lot better camera than Galaxy F23, although it has a back camera with less mega pixels, they both have the same diafragm aperture.
The LG Velvet counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy F23, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy F23 counts with superior battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.