Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is slightly better than the Galaxy F41, getting an 87.1 score against 85.2. LG Velvet is a a little lighter and somewhat thinner device than Galaxy F41, although they were released only 5 months apart. The Galaxy F41 has a little bit better looking screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
The LG Velvet counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy F41 and LG Velvet feature incredibly similar processors, they have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 features a much longer battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 40% greater battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy F41 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.