Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F62 is a little bit better than the LG Velvet, with a score of 88.1 against 87.1. Samsung Galaxy F62's construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than LG Velvet. The LG Velvet counts with a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have 6 GB of RAM, the LG Velvet also has more cores (but slower).
The Galaxy F62 features a little sharper display than LG Velvet, although it has a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little lower pixels quantity in each display inch and a quite smaller screen. Galaxy F62 captures a bit better photos and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with a way better 64 MP resolution.
LG Velvet has a greater storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy F62 has a much longer battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.