Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-04-07 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 900 MT6877 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is much better than Galaxy M53 5G's overall score of 76.7. LG Velvet is an older, just a little thicker and just a little bit heavier phone than Galaxy M53 5G. LG Velvet counts with a very superior processor than Galaxy M53 5G. They have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM.
LG Velvet has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy M53 5G, because it has a little bit bigger display, a slightly better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. LG Velvet captures a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M53 5G, because although it has a way less megapixels back-facing camera, and they both have a same size aperture, the LG Velvet also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The LG Velvet has much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy M53 5G, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG Velvet also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M53 5G has superior battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has a 16 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.