Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is a little bit better than Galaxy Note 3, with an 87.1 score against 81.2. The LG Velvet design is notably newer and a bit thinner, but also just a little heavier than Galaxy Note 3. The LG Velvet has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has just a bit better screen than LG Velvet, although it has a quite worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a little bit smaller display. The LG Velvet has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG Velvet also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video, a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a way larger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG Velvet has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Velvet counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG Velvet is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.